In reality, anything could be considered a piece of art. After visiting the Palmer Museum and seeing numerous paintings throughout my education, there are many works of art that are published that just don't seem to be deserving. One painting in the Palmer that I saw was a canvas with lines of paint. That was it. Just lines of paint from a brush. How is that art? Art is interpreted by the artist. No one knows the mood or feeling going into a piece of art except for the person making it, so no one can really say that something is not art. I am not an artsy person whatsoever, nor will I ever be, but I consider anything to be art. Any piece created by someone can be considered art.
http://www.google.com/imgres?q=fenway+park+art&um=1&hl=en&sa=N&biw=1136&bih=684&tbm=isch&tbnid=9Hc8IPm69L_EUM:&imgrefurl=http://www.bostonspastime.com/fenwaypainting.html&docid=K68DRhaZRe96nM&imgurl=http://www.bostonspastime.com/shop/fenwayshea.jpg&w=365&h=266&ei=V2tfT9C_OMjx0gGu1-TJBw&zoom=1&iact=hc&vpx=264&vpy=285&dur=7190&hovh=192&hovw=263&tx=136&ty=114&sig=106681146352279900270&page=1&tbnh=116&tbnw=155&start=0&ndsp=18&ved=1t:429,r:13,s:0
This painting of Fenway Park is a piece of art I enjoy. I found it on google images. What strikes me about this piece if how well the artist drew the landscape of Fenway Park. Every structure in the stadium is drawn with great proportion. It evokes happiness, pride, and good vibes when I see it. I think it merits the term art because it was drawn by somebody else, pretty simple.
No comments:
Post a Comment